By (@BigEasyCat44)
Sep 4, 2013

Nate Williams is a former Northwestern linebacker. He will be providing his perspective on NU games this season.

Given all the recent controversy that has come up in the wake of the NU vs Cal game regarding Northwestern defensive players “faking injuries,” I thought I would throw my two cents in. As you may have known, I played middle linebacker for three years under the current defensive staff and five years in total for Coach Fitz. I was in every defensive meeting room and knew every game plan through and through. A lot of writers, bloggers, and fans have been very critical of NUs defense late in the game, as well as Fitz’s postgame quotes and possible “tactics.” I can say this with almost 100% validity, NU did not coach or tell anyone to fake injuries and certainly did not practice it like Kirk Herbstreit claims many teams do.

To start lets take a look at Fitz’s post game quotes:

Fitzgerald told the Chicago Sun-Times, “Our guys get dinged up. They get dinged up, they’re instructed to go down.” he at a later point said “They’re instructed to go down not hobble of to the sideline.”

My Experience:

What Fitz explained has gone on at NU. Guess what… Its not against the rules, and it shouldn’t be frowned upon. This mentality has not only been preached  by the coaching and training staff, but by players as well. It is also worth to note, that this “tactic” is something that is not only advised for no huddle and uptempo offenses, but also for your traditional pro-style offense. The idea of it is pretty simple: if you get “dinged up” or hurt on a play, you get the attention of the referee by looking for medical assistance regardless the severity of the injury or “ding.” To do so, you either take a knee, or remain on the ground to allow the referee to acknowledge the situation so you can seek the proper attention. This allows the coaching staff to notice that they need to find the proper replacement.

This is something that obviously gets noticed a lot more in no huddle, uptempo situations, simply because the defense has time to catch their breath. I have been in situations where some guys have ran off the field with maybe an upper extremity injury and no one goes into replace them, leaving the defense with 10 guys. This happens more so with uptempo offenses, but also occurs with traditional offenses as well.

I have been equally as tired from a long drive of a pro style offense as an offense similar to Cal, and we were always regarded as one of the best conditioned teams in the nation. It is also an “unwritten rule” amongst players when playing against uptempo offenses to “stay down.” If I had a nickel every time I’ve heard “man just stay down” from teammates regarding guys (or myself) trying to tough it out on their way to the sidelines, I’d have a lot of nickels. There are a lot of egos in football, and the macho man inside many of us want to do the “tough guy” thing and walk off on our own power, but there are smarter ways of doing it. In this era of player safety it is just smart football, and Northwestern has always epitomized smart football.

Defending the Uptempo Offense:

A man I have a lot of respect for and have had the pleasure with speaking at length, whether before games for interviews or other private conversations, is ESPN analyst Chris Spielman. He recently was quoted in an article posted days before the Cal game about how faking injuries will be see more these days and coaches will and have started practicing faking. Spielman said he “wouldn’t go down for anybody” if asked to fake an injury.

If Spielman ran a defense, he would counter offensive tempo with more defensive audibles based on scouting reports. I certainly agree. Northwestern has this done many times in the past, most notably with Missouri during the Alamo Bowl, as Coach Hankwitz put together one of the best defensive game plans I can remember being a part of. We had 30+ days to gameplan for Missouri and full season worth of tape. The only tape that was available for Cal was a spring game. Huge difference.

“Hurt Vs Injured”

There is a pretty universal feeling amongst football coaches, and players alike about the difference between being  “Hurt” and “Injured”. What you saw from DJ Jones and Kain Colter: Injured (none of which were called to question and understandably so). What you saw from Venric Mark, Will Hampton, Chi Chi Ariguzo and Damien Proby: Hurt (all of which were called into question, Proby in particular). I bring up Mark only to prove a point: you can still play while hurt. Guys do it all the time and I did on numerous occasions. Getting hurt can be anything from rolling an ankle to a cut that needs bandaged (which officials actually force you off to the sideline). So to call out the others for coming back into the game based merely on the situational state of the game is a cop out. There has never been any coach I have played for who looked down on a player coming off, rubbing some dirt on it and getting back out there.

I think that Hampton and Ariguzo both had legitimate “dings” and took advantage of the ability to be able get off the field safely and allow their subs to come in. It just so happens that also allows the rest of the defense gets a short breather. Proby, on the other hand, may have slightly embellished the situation, not the injury. I don’t doubt that he was hurt. I think he was being a heady player, and realized that he was hurt and on the complete other side of the field and unable to make it all the way back 53.33 yards in 5-10 seconds. To think that someone who is even slightly hurt and went as many plays as he did would be able to sprint or even jog back to the other side of the field in 5-10 seconds is completely irrational, and anyone who thinks that likely never played a down of football. Either way you cut it, there was not a single “flop” or “fake” of an injury, simply a team taking advantage of the rules in place when player gets dinged up (starters and star players, nonetheless).

Now I will never try to defend a tactic that is outwardly going out of its way to embellish, flop, or outright fake injuries, just as Cal did so against Oregon in 2010 — and this is not trying to reflect back negatively onto the current Cal team, I know it was a different staff. I have always been raised and coached with the southwest Pennsylvania, blue collar ideals of “rub some dirt and get back in the game.” This is different. In high school, there are not many, if any, officiating crews capable of letting offenses run this kind of tempo. This is college football, where speed and efficiency is the goal of every team and officiating crew. Unfortunately, it puts the defense at a huge disadvantage for substitutions and can put players in harms way. While I don’t think any player came out based purely on them running out of gas, it surely had something to do with it. Getting “gassed” during a drive often makes players lose their fundamental techniques and lose mental focus, putting them out of position during play. Getting put in poor position both technically and within the framework of the defensive game plan can lead to injuries. I believe this is what happened with the Cats this game.

Solution:

If the inner workings of college football is going to have these differentiations between being hurt and injured, the rules need to reflect that. I have no issue with it doing so. Situations such as this has happened against the Northwestern offense in the past, so there is no reason it would negatively affect us. A solution I would suggest is if a player is to go down with an “injury,” which I still feel is an arbitrary term, they must stay out for more than just one play. A team would have to either use a timeout to allow the player to returnc(similar to the new and bogus helmet rule), or would have to wait until the next first down is achieved. Anything further or longer than the next first down is far too long.

To note, Page FR-11 of the NCAA Rulebook reads:

“Feigning an injury for any reason is unethical. An injured player must be given full protection under the rules, but feigning injury is dishonest, unsportsmanlike and contrary to the spirit of the rules. Such tactics cannot be tolerated among sportsmen of integrity.”

For the record: “Feigning” is defined as “pretend to be affected by (a feeling, state, or injury)”

Welcome to 2013, Cats — and Cal — fans. The Cats national attention both good and bad because, well… we are now nationally relevant. We got put into the national spotlight for a very tough game that many thought would be a “trap game” and came out on top. We didn’t break any rules and didn’t do anything that should be frowned upon, unless its by the losing team whining about it. If you feel any differently, I don’t know what to tell you: “Yeah well, you know, thats just like your opinion man” – The Dude.

  • LG

    The next first down is too arbitrary, that could be just one play. A better solution would be the rest of the series, or 5 plays, whichever comes first. I don’t think missing 5 plays too much to ask for someone who was hurt enough to stop the game.

    • Nate W.

      I think 5 could be a tad high. Entire series could be too much depending on the situation. Next1st down would force the player to miss a critical play, which I think is deserving at minimum.

      • Jonathan Hodges

        Another problem with anything beyond 1 play is that someone (an official) would have to keep track, and when you’re dealing with multiple players coming out on different plays, this could be a pain and would likely lead to more issues.

        • Nate W.

          Its tough… but im sure there are ways of monitoring it, add an official in the booth possibly. I dont think the NCAA will do much to hinder the uptempo offense, more points more upsets more viewership = more money

  • JG

    Proby had a legitimate injury concern as replay showed him shaking his arm and hand after several plays followed by the medical staff clearly evaluating his cervical spine. Nerve damage caused by cervical vertebral compression, trauma and instability (C5-8 in this case) can manifest as arm or hand pain and is not something to be ignored, especially for a violent sport such as football. Further game participation and trauma could result in quadriplegia (or worse) for the athlete.

    • Nate W.

      Hey now, im no doctor or athletic trainer and it certainly appears you have some experience/knowledge with. I never doubted he was hurt. I know him personally and know the kid is tough as nails. Just saying given the situation it appeared as he embellished the situation…. not the injury. I should edit that.

      • JG

        I know what you’re saying, but in this case I’m just acknowledging that it was probably fortunate he did go to the sidelines several times since something he might have tried to play through or around could have had disastrous consequences.

        • Nate W.

          For Certain… Better safe than sorry.

  • Jonathan Hodges

    Thanks for writing this article! It’s probably the best one I’ve seen on this subject and provides some useful details on what happens between the whistle and the snap.

    One other thing that a national writer brought up (can’t remember where at this point) is that by running hurry-up, the offense is essentially taking advantage of a rule written in their favor (regarding substitutions). Since that is exploiting the rule to some extent, it’s only fair that the defense should have a chance to counteract that (not by faking, but by going down when dinged up/cramping/etc.).

    • Nate W.

      Oh entirely, 100% correct. It is usually only seen with a team that has maybe inferior skilled players or offensive lineman than the status quo (strength and size wise). So they use it to wear out a Defenses front 7 giving them the advantage. We did it in my years, but not to Dykes extreme.

      It was actually pretty funny I was rewatching the Syracuse game against PSU and on PSUs first offensive drive maybe 6-7 plays into after Penn St went and got a 4th down conversion, they went hurry up… #3 ‘Cuses FS gets lined up at his position, and looks to the sideline and collapses…. Yet not a peep from ESPN. FIRST DRIVE only MAYBE SEVEN PLAYS! Couldnt believe what I was seeing after all this blahter about faking

  • Marc Linhardt

    The easiest and I think most likely situation is to move to NFL timing rules, which would naturally shorten the game. No NFL team gets anywhere near 99 plays http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/plays-per-game which would make the game “safer”. We will see truly how the fast game works with Philly and the Chip Kelly experiment.

  • GoBears

    Tell yourselves whatever you need to…

    • Nate W.

      We dont need to tell ourselves anything, its a distant memory now. Especially with it occurring in the NFL, no one will hear your whining any longer Go Buckeyes (first and only time you’ll hear me say that this year)

      • GoBears

        So distant, you’re here 18 hours ago and ranting, “Go Buckeyes.” Too funny. Get ready to flop again vs. Ohio St. :)

© 2013 Inside Northwestern